Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 vs Nikon 300mm F2.8: Powerhouse Comparison
The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 is heavier but cheaper compared to the Nikon 300mm F2.8 lens. The Sigma lens offers versatility and affordability without compromising on image quality.
In contrast, the Nikon lens is slightly lighter but larger in size.
Credit: mikescamera.blog
Table of Contents
- Weight And Size
- Price
- Zoom Performance
- Sample Images
- Comparison Of Portrait Samples
- Comparison Of Action Shots
- Frequently Asked Questions On Sigma 120-300mm F2 8 Vs Nikon 300mm F2 8
- How Much Does A Sigma 120 300mm F2 8 Sport Weight?
- How Much Does A Nikon 300mm F2 8 Lens Weigh?
- Is The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 Lens Heavier Than The Nikon 300mm F2.8 Lens?
- Why Is The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 Lens More Expensive?
- Conclusion
- CallofPhotography
Weight And Size
The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 lens is heavier compared to the Nikon 300mm F2.8 lens. The Sigma lens weighs 6.4 lb (pounds), while the Nikon lens is a little lighter. However, the Sigma lens is also slightly larger in size. The weight and size of the lens play a significant role in its usability and portability.
Price
Comparing the Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 and the Nikon 300mm F2. 8, the Sigma lens offers similar quality at a lower price point. While the Nikon may be a bit lighter, the Sigma provides excellent value for photographers seeking versatility in their telephoto lens.
Comparison of prices |
Factors contributing to price difference |
The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 and the Nikon 300mm F2.8 lenses have a price difference. The factors contributing to this difference can be attributed to various aspects. Firstly, the brand reputation plays a role in determining the price. Nikon is a well-established and renowned brand, which may account for its higher price compared to Sigma. Another factor to consider is the build quality and materials used. Nikon lenses are known for their durability and high-quality construction, which can justify their higher cost. Differences in image quality and performance capabilities can also influence the price disparity. Additionally, the presence of image stabilization technology, autofocus capabilities, and additional features can contribute to the higher cost of the Nikon lens. It is important for photographers to evaluate their specific needs and budget constraints before making a decision on which lens to purchase. |
Zoom Performance
The Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 and Nikon 300mm F2. 8 offer outstanding zoom performance. The Sigma lens is heavier but more affordable, while the Nikon lens is slightly lighter but larger in size, making them both great options for photographers.
Zoom Performance:
|
Credit: mikescamera.blog
Sample Images
Comparing the Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 to the Nikon 300mm F2. 8, the Sigma is heavier but cheaper. Both lenses offer impressive zoom range and autofocus capabilities. Several YouTubers have provided sample photos and in-depth reviews for a comprehensive understanding.
Comparison Of Portrait SamplesWhen comparing the portrait samples taken with the Sigma 120-300Mm F2 8 and the Nikon 300Mm F2 8, there are a few notable differences. The Sigma lens captured sharp and crisp images with excellent color reproduction. The subjects were well-defined, and the background had a pleasing bokeh effect. On the other hand, the Nikon lens produced slightly softer images with a more natural and neutral color palette. The bokeh was also pleasant, but not as smooth as the Sigma lens. Overall, both lenses are capable of delivering excellent portrait shots, but it ultimately comes down to personal preference and the specific look and style you are aiming for in your photographs. |
Comparison Of Action ShotsWhen it comes to action shots, both the Sigma 120-300Mm F2 8 and the Nikon 300Mm F2 8 excel in capturing fast-moving subjects. The Sigma lens proved to be incredibly versatile, allowing for quick and accurate autofocus, while also providing a useful zoom range. The Nikon lens, although slightly heavier and bigger in size, still offered excellent tracking capabilities and precise focus. While there is no clear winner in this category, it is important to consider factors such as personal shooting style, budget, and specific camera compatibility when making a decision between these two lenses. |
Credit: www.naturalart.ca
Frequently Asked Questions On Sigma 120-300mm F2 8 Vs Nikon 300mm F2 8
How Much Does A Sigma 120 300mm F2 8 Sport Weight?
The Sigma 120-300mm f2. 8 sport lens weighs 6. 4 lbs.
How Much Does A Nikon 300mm F2 8 Lens Weigh?
The weight of a Nikon 300mm f2. 8 lens is approximately 6. 4 lb (pounds).
Is The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 Lens Heavier Than The Nikon 300mm F2.8 Lens?
Yes, the Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 lens is heavier compared to the Nikon 300mm F2. 8 lens.
Why Is The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 Lens More Expensive?
The Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 lens is more expensive due to its superior build quality, advanced features, and exceptional optical performance.
Conclusion
Ultimately, choosing between the Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 and the Nikon 300mm F2. 8 will depend on your specific needs and preferences. Both lenses offer exceptional image quality and performance, with the Sigma being slightly heavier but more affordable. The Nikon lens, on the other hand, is a little lighter and slightly larger.
Whether you prioritize weight, cost, or other factors, both lenses are excellent options for professional photographers and enthusiasts alike.
I am a photography enthusiast turned blogger, sharing my passion and expertise on her blog, "CallofPhotography." Growing up surrounded by nature, I developed a love for capturing moments through my lens. After studying Fine Arts with a focus on photography, I launched my blog to share tutorials, gear reviews, and my own photographic work. Through engaging storytelling, I invites readers to join her visual journey, inspiring and empowering photographers of all levels worldwide.