Nikon F5 Vs F100: Ultimate Comparison for Photographers

Spread the love

Hey there, friends! I’ve been shooting film for over two decades, and today, I’m excited to share my experiences with two iconic Nikon SLRs: the Nikon F5 vs F100. These cameras are legends, each with unique strengths that cater to different photographers. Having used both in everything from weddings to wildlife shoots, I’ll walk you through their differences to help you pick the right one. Let’s dive into their design, features, performance, and more, all while hanging out over a virtual coffee.

Photography is about capturing moments, and the right gear makes all the difference. In this guide, I’ll compare the F5 and F100 across key aspects like build quality, autofocus, metering, and image quality. You’ll find a comparison table, real-world insights, and a decision-making section to match your needs. Whether you’re chasing action shots or strolling through city streets, I’ve got you covered. Let’s get started!

Nikon F5 Vs F100 Comparison

Design and Build Quality

The F5 is built like a tank, with a magnesium alloy body that feels indestructible. Weighing around 1,125 grams, it’s heavy but stable, especially with big lenses. Its weather sealing is top-notch—I once shot a wedding in a downpour, and the F5 didn’t flinch. The deep grip makes it comfortable for long shoots, even with my larger hands.

The F100, on the other hand, uses polycarbonate and metal, making it lighter at about 720 grams. This portability was a lifesaver during street photography in crowded cities. It’s also weather-sealed, though it feels slightly less rugged than the F5. Its smaller grip suits smaller hands or those who prefer a compact feel.

The F5’s weight distribution is excellent, balancing heavy lenses well. I’ve carried it with a 70-200mm lens for hours without strain. The F100, while less balanced with big glass, is easier to toss in a bag for travel. If you shoot in harsh conditions, the F5’s durability is unmatched. For portability, the F100 shines.

The choice depends on your needs. Professionals tackling tough environments will love the F5’s robustness. Enthusiasts or travelers will appreciate the F100’s lighter design. Both are built to last, but the F5 feels like it could survive a war zone.

Key Features: Autofocus and Metering

Both cameras use the Multi-CAM 1300 autofocus system with five focus points, which is fast and reliable. The F5, however, pairs this with 3D Color Matrix Metering II, using a 1,005-pixel RGB sensor to analyze color and brightness. This makes it a beast in mixed lighting—like indoor events with flash and ambient light. Shooting a concert, I trusted the F5 to nail exposures without constant tweaks.

The F100 uses a 10-segment matrix metering system, which is solid but lacks color analysis. In tricky lighting, like backlit portraits, I often switched to spot metering to get the subject’s face right. Both offer center-weighted and spot metering for flexibility. The F5’s dedicated exposure compensation dial is a time-saver during fast-paced shoots, while the F100 requires menu navigation, which can slow you down.

Autofocus performance is strong on both, but the F5 has a slight edge with fast-moving subjects. Photographing athletes, it locked onto runners effortlessly, even in dim light. The F100 is great but sometimes struggles with off-center or low-contrast subjects. With practice, I got sharp shots by using the center focus point and recomposing.

If you need precision in challenging conditions, the F5’s advanced features give it an edge. For most scenarios, the F100’s autofocus and metering are more than capable, especially with manual adjustments.

Performance: Speed and Battery Life

The F5 is a powerhouse for action photography, shooting at 8 frames per second (fps) with the MB-21 battery pack. This speed was crucial when I photographed a cheetah sprinting across the savanna—every frame was sharp. The F100 shoots at 4.5 fps (5 fps with the MB-15 pack), which is decent but not as fast. During a basketball game, I had to time my shots carefully with the F100 to capture key moments.

Battery life differs significantly. The F5 uses eight AA batteries, offering long-lasting power but adding weight. The F100, with four AA batteries, is lighter but needs more frequent changes. On a travel shoot, I swapped F100 batteries often, while the F5 kept going. In cold weather, the F5’s battery pack held up better, which was a relief during winter shoots.

Both cameras have shutter speeds from 30 seconds to 1/8,000s, giving you versatility. The F5’s 1/250s flash sync speed beats the F100’s 1/125s, offering more creative options with flash. The F5’s buffer can handle up to 140 frames in continuous shooting, while the F100 manages around 100. For sports or wildlife, the F5’s speed and stamina are unmatched.

If you shoot fast action or need long battery life, the F5 is the clear winner. For general use, the F100’s performance is still impressive and less taxing to carry.

Image Quality

Since both are 35mm film SLRs, image quality depends on your film and lenses. Both deliver sharp, vibrant images with excellent detail. The F5’s advanced metering, however, produces more consistent exposures in tough lighting. Shooting landscapes with wide dynamic ranges, the F5 preserved details in shadows and highlights. With the F100, I sometimes bracketed shots to achieve similar results.

The F100 still performs admirably, especially with manual adjustments. During a sunrise shoot with slide film, it nailed exposures with minimal effort. For black and white photography, the F5’s metering captured nuanced tones in high-contrast scenes, adding depth to street shots. I’ve shot portraits with both using Portra 400, and the results were stunning—rich colors, fine detail.

Different films yield different results. With color negative film, both cameras handle overexposure well, giving flexibility in post-processing. Slide film demands precise metering, where the F5’s system shines. Black and white film, like Ilford HP5, looks fantastic on both, though the F5’s metering helps in tricky lighting. Your film choice matters more than the camera body, but the F5’s metering gives it a slight edge.

For most photographers, image quality won’t be the deciding factor. Both cameras produce stunning results, and it’s about how they help you achieve those shots.

Lens Compatibility

Both the F5 and F100 use the Nikon F-mount, supporting a vast range of lenses, from modern AF-S to older AI-S models. Autofocus and metering work seamlessly with AF, AF-D, and G-type lenses. For non-CPU lenses, the F5’s electronic rangefinder makes manual focusing easier, which I loved when using a 200mm f/4 Micro for landscapes. The F100 supports older lenses but lacks this feature, making manual focus trickier.

Third-party lenses from Sigma or Tamron work too, though compatibility should be checked. I’ve used a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 with both, and autofocus was smooth. Recommended lenses include the Nikon 50mm f/1.8 for versatility or the 85mm f/1.4 for portraits. For wildlife, a 70-200mm f/2.8 pairs well with the F5’s stability. The F100’s lighter body suits smaller primes for street photography.

If you own a mix of modern and vintage lenses, either camera works well. The F5’s manual focus support might sway collectors of classic glass.

User Experience: Handling and Controls

The F5 feels like a precision instrument, with buttons and dials for nearly every function. Its 100% viewfinder coverage ensures accurate composition—I never missed a shot due to framing errors. However, its complex interface can overwhelm newcomers. During a fashion shoot, the F5’s controls let me adjust settings without looking away.

The F100 has a simpler layout, with some functions in menus, making it beginner-friendly. Its 96% viewfinder is excellent, though you might clip edges occasionally. Teaching students, I found the F100’s interface easier for them to grasp. The learning curve for the F5 is steeper, but once mastered, it’s incredibly efficient.

Both cameras have comfortable grips, but the F5 suits larger hands better. The F100’s compact design is great for smaller hands or travel. Customization options on the F5, like programmable function buttons, let you tailor it to your workflow. The F100 offers fewer customizations but is intuitive out of the box.

Your experience level matters. Pros will love the F5’s control, while enthusiasts may prefer the F100’s simplicity.

Accessories

Both cameras support accessories that enhance functionality. The F5’s MB-21 battery pack boosts shooting speed to 8 fps and extends battery life. I used it during action shoots, and it was a game-changer. The F100’s MB-15 pack increases speed to 5 fps and adds power, perfect for moderate action.

Remote shutters are available for both, minimizing shake in long exposures. Data backs, which record exposure info, are useful for archival or client work. I’ve used a data back on the F5 for editorial shoots, ensuring accurate records. Both cameras also support cable releases for discreet shooting, like at weddings.

If you plan to use accessories, the F5 offers more robust options for professional needs. The F100’s accessories are sufficient for most enthusiasts.

Historical Context

The F5, launched in 1996, was Nikon’s flagship film SLR, replacing the F4. It was praised for its advanced features and durability, earning accolades from photojournalists and sports photographers (Nikon F5 Specs). The F100, released in 1999, offered similar capabilities in a lighter, more affordable package, appealing to enthusiasts (Nikon F100 Specs).

At the time, both represented the pinnacle of film camera technology. Today, they’re sought after by film enthusiasts for their build quality and unique aesthetic. The F5 was a professional staple, while the F100 bridged the gap for serious amateurs.

Modern Use

Why choose a film camera today? For many, it’s the tactile experience, deliberate pace, and distinct film look. Digital cameras offer instant review and higher ISOs, but film encourages mindful composition. Using the F5 or F100, I think more carefully about each shot, leading to better results.

Film photography has a vibrant community, with photographers sharing work on platforms like X (Film Photography). Both cameras are perfect for exploring film’s aesthetic, whether you’re shooting color, black and white, or slide film. They’re also great for learning photography fundamentals, as their manual controls teach exposure and focus.

Comparison Table: Nikon F5 vs F100

Here’s a table to make the Nikon F5 vs F100 comparison clearer:

FeatureNikon F5Nikon F100
Body MaterialMagnesium alloyPolycarbonate and metal
Weight (body only)~1,125g~720g
Shooting Speed8 fps (with MB-21)4.5 fps (5 fps with MB-15)
Autofocus Points5 (Multi-CAM 1300)5 (Multi-CAM 1300)
Metering System3D Color Matrix Metering II10-segment Matrix Metering
Viewfinder Coverage100%96%
Battery8 AA or MB-214 AA or MB-15
Continuous ShootingUp to 140 frames (with MB-21)Up to 100 frames
ISO Range6-6400 (with push)6-6400 (with push)
Shutter Speed30s – 1/8,000s30s – 1/8,000s
Flash Sync Speed1/250s1/125s

This table highlights key differences, helping you weigh your options quickly.

Decision-Making: Which Should You Choose?

In the Nikon F5 vs F100 debate, your choice hinges on your needs. Professionals shooting sports, wildlife, or photojournalism will likely prefer the F5 for its durability, speed, and advanced features. Its 8 fps burst mode and robust build were game-changers during high-pressure assignments. If you don’t mind the weight, the F5 is a reliable partner.

Enthusiasts or semi-pros may find the F100 more appealing. Its lighter weight and simpler controls make it ideal for travel, street photography, or casual shoots. I loved using the F100 for city explorations, where portability was key. If you want high performance without complexity, the F100 delivers.

Consider your shooting style: harsh conditions or heavy lenses favor the F5, while portability and ease of use point to the F100. Both are excellent, so you can’t go wrong. If you’re torn, think about your priorities—durability vs. weight, advanced features vs. simplicity. For mixed use, the F100’s versatility might edge out slightly, but the F5’s power is hard to beat for pros.

Conclusion

Both the Nikon F5 and F100 are timeless film cameras that deliver exceptional results. The F5, with its professional-grade features and rugged build, is perfect for demanding shoots where reliability is paramount. The F100, lighter and more approachable, suits enthusiasts seeking quality without the bulk. Whether you choose the F5’s power or the F100’s portability, you’re getting a tool that elevates your photography. Happy shooting, friends!

FAQ Section

Can I use my existing Nikon lenses on both cameras?
Yes, both use the Nikon F-mount, so your lenses will work. Older non-CPU lenses may need manual settings on the F100, while the F5 handles them seamlessly with its electronic rangefinder.

Which camera has better low-light performance?
Both excel in low light, but the F5’s 3D Color Matrix Metering II may yield better exposures in mixed lighting. The difference is subtle but noticeable in extreme conditions.

Is the F5 worth the extra investment over the F100?
For professional work requiring advanced features, yes. For hobbyists or lighter use, the F100 offers great value with minimal compromise.

How do they compare ergonomically?
The F5’s larger grip suits extended use or heavy lenses. The F100’s smaller, lighter design is easier for shorter hands or casual shooting.

Are there significant differences in image quality?
No, both produce excellent images. The F5’s metering may save time in tough lighting, but film and lenses matter more.

Which is better for portrait photography?
Both are great, but the F5’s metering helps with skin tones in varied light. The F100 works well with manual adjustments.

Can these be used with digital backs?
Yes, digital backs can convert them to digital, but compatibility varies. Film purists may prefer their traditional workflow.

How do they compare to modern digital cameras?
Digital cameras offer instant review and higher ISOs, but these film cameras provide a unique aesthetic and tactile experience many still love.

callofphotography.com
Website |  + posts

I am a photography enthusiast turned blogger, sharing my passion and expertise on this blog, "CallofPhotography." Growing up surrounded by nature, I developed a love for capturing moments through my lens. After studying Fine Arts with a focus on photography, I launched my blog to share tutorials, gear reviews, and my own photographic work. Through engaging storytelling, I invites readers to join her visual journey, inspiring and empowering photographers of all levels worldwide.

Leave a Comment