Tamron 150 600 G2 Vs Nikon 200 500: The Ultimate Comparison
The Nikon 200-500 is slightly sharper but heavier and bulkier than the Tamron 150-600 G2. These lenses differ in terms of sharpness, weight, and handling.
Photographers often face the dilemma of choosing between the Tamron 150-600 G2 and Nikon 200-500 lenses. Both offer impressive telephoto capabilities suitable for wildlife, sports, and outdoor photography. However, the Nikon 200-500 is slightly sharper, offers better color contrast, and shows fine details significantly clearer.
On the other hand, the Tamron 150-600 G2 is lighter and more manageable, allowing for easier handling and longer shooting sessions. The Nikon 200-500 is ideal for photographers who prioritize image sharpness, while the Tamron 150-600 G2 is excellent for those who want a lens with lighter weight and better handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two lenses depends on the photographer’s specific needs and preferences.
Credit: photographylife.com
Table of Contents
- Specs Comparison
- Field Test
- Pros And Cons
- Sharpness And Image Quality Comparison
- Zoom Range And Focusing Speed
- Handling And Build Quality
- Frequently Asked Questions Of Tamron 150 600 G2 Vs Nikon 200 500
- What Is The Difference Between Nikon 200 500 And Tamron 150 600?
- Is The Tamron 150 To 600 Sharp?
- Is Tamron Lens Good For Nikon?
- Is Tamron 150 600 G2 Weather Sealed?
- Conclusion
Specs Comparison
The Tamron 150 600 G2 and Nikon 200 500 are two popular lenses for wildlife and sports photography. While the Nikon is slightly sharper and snappier in focus, the Tamron offers a weight advantage and better handling. The choice ultimately depends on the photographer’s specific needs and preferences.
| Physical Specs | Image Quality and Sharpness | Zoom Range and Focusing | Price Comparison | Compatibility with Nikon Cameras |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Tamron 150-600 G2 and the Nikon 200-500 are similar in size and weight. | The Tamron produces sharp images throughout its range when stopped down, while the Nikon is sharper and shows finer details more clearly. | The Tamron has a slightly longer zoom range and faster focusing speed, while the Nikon has snappier focus and better contrast. | The Tamron is priced slightly higher than the Nikon, but both are relatively affordable compared to other super-telephoto lenses. | Both lenses are compatible with Nikon cameras, with Tamron offering Di and Di II lenses for Nikon DSLR and mirrorless cameras with the compatible Nikon FTZ adapter. |
Credit: www.dpreview.com
Field Test
When it comes to choosing between Tamron 150-600 G2 and Nikon 200-500, it’s essential to do a field test under different test conditions and settings.
Firstly, let’s discuss the image review and sample photos. Tamron offers good sharpness overall, while Nikon is slightly sharper, with better colors and contrast, making fine details more visible.
In terms of handling and comfort, Tamron wins as it is relatively light and handholdable, especially for a lens of its focal length. However, Nikon’s build quality is better with weather-sealed body construction.
Autofocus and focusing speed are crucial for a telephoto lens, especially when capturing fast-moving objects. Tamron provides accurate and quick autofocus, while Nikon is snapier, but not significantly better.
Lastly, performance in different lighting conditions is a crucial factor for any lens. Tamron’s effective image stabilization performs well in low light, while Nikon’s overall image quality remains better even in low light.
| Criteria | Tamron 150-600 G2 | Nikon 200-500 |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Range | 150-600 | 200-500 |
| Weight | 2010 g | 2300 g |
| Lens Mount | Canon, Nikon, Sony | Nikon F-Bayonet |
| Price | $1399 | $1396.95 |
After considering all the factors, it’s clear that both lenses have their pros and cons. Tamron 150-600 G2 is an ideal choice for nature and wildlife photographers who require handheld photography, whereas Nikon 200-500 is a perfect fit for professionals who prioritize image quality and build quality over the weight of the lens.
Pros And Cons
Looking for a comparison between the Tamron 150-600 G2 and the Nikon 200-500? Here are some of the pros and cons:
| Tamron 150-600 G2 Pros | Tamron 150-600 G2 Cons |
|---|---|
| Effective image stabilization | Slightly less sharp than Nikon 200-500 |
| Lighter and more handholdable | Longer and bulkier |
| Good zoom range | Slower focusing speed |
| Lower price point |
| Nikon 200-500 Pros | Nikon 200-500 Cons |
|---|---|
| Sharper overall | Heavier and bulkier |
| Snappier focus | More expensive |
| Better contrast and color | Shorter zoom range |
Which one to choose? It ultimately depends on your personal preferences and needs. If weight and price are important factors, the Tamron may be the better choice. If you prioritize sharpness and faster focus, the Nikon may be the winner.
Credit: www.dpreview.com
Sharpness And Image Quality Comparison
In terms of sharpness and image quality, the Tamron 150-600 G2 and Nikon 200-500 are both great options for wildlife and bird photography. While the Nikon is slightly sharper with better colors and contrast, the Tamron is lighter and easier to handle.
Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on individual preferences and needs.
| Sharpness and Image Quality Comparison |
| The Tamron 150-600 G2 and Nikon 200-500 are two of the most popular zoom lenses for wildlife and bird photography. In terms of sharpness, the Nikon is slightly better and has faster and snappier autofocus. However, the Tamron delivers good sharpness overall, particularly at longer distances, and it is lighter and easier to handle. |
| Sharpness Comparison in Different Settings |
| Both lenses perform well when stopped down, but the Nikon is sharper throughout the zoom range even when wide open. The Tamron offers effective image stabilization, which helps to compensate for the lower sharpness in some situations. |
| Image Quality Comparison for Photos and Videos |
| The Nikon delivers better colors, contrast, and clarity, making fine details more visible, while the Tamron produces softer images with less contrast but still produces good results. For videography, the Tamron offers smoother and quieter autofocus, which is essential for capturing moving subjects. |
| Low Light Comparison |
| The Tamron performs well in low light, offering brighter images and better contrast than the Nikon, thanks to its larger maximum aperture. Both lenses have their strengths and weaknesses, and the final choice depends on the personal preferences, the shooting conditions, and the budget. |
Zoom Range And Focusing Speed
The Tamron 150-600 G2 and Nikon 200-500 are two popular telephoto lenses used by photographers. When it comes to zoom range and focusing speed, the Tamron 150-600 G2 offers a longer zoom range, while the Nikon 200-500 offers snappier focusing.
However, the Tamron is lighter and more manageable for handheld use.
| Zoom Comparison |
| The Tamron 150-600 G2 and the Nikon 200-500 are both excellent lenses for wildlife and bird photography. While the Tamron has a longer zoom range, the Nikon has better sharpness and focus accuracy. The Tamron is also lighter in weight and more compact, making it easier to handle. However, the Nikon has nicer colors and contrast, and shows fine details more clearly. In terms of focusing and tracking moving subjects, the Tamron has fast and accurate autofocus, while the Nikon has snappier focus. For manual focusing experience, both lenses perform well. Overall, choosing between these two lenses comes down to personal preference and shooting needs. |
| Focusing and Tracking for Moving Subjects |
| The Tamron 150-600 G2 and the Nikon 200-500 both offer fast and accurate autofocus for focusing and tracking moving subjects. The Tamron has a slight edge in focusing speed, while the Nikon has snappier focus. In terms of tracking, both lenses perform well, but the Tamron’s autofocus system provides better accuracy. Overall, both lenses are great for wildlife and bird photography, but the Tamron’s autofocus system may be more suitable for fast-moving subjects. |
| Manual Focusing Experience |
| For manual focusing experience, both the Tamron 150-600 G2 and the Nikon 200-500 perform well. Both lenses have smooth manual focus rings and offer a good amount of resistance. However, some users may prefer the feel of one lens over the other. It’s recommended to try both lenses out before making a purchasing decision based on manual focusing experience. |
Handling And Build Quality
When it comes to handling and build quality, the Tamron 150 600 G2 and Nikon 200 500 offer similar performance with minor differences. The Tamron lens is lighter and more handholdable for a lens of its focal length. It provides comfortable shooting, making it suitable for long periods of use. The Tamron lens is also built with effective image stabilization and quick autofocus, resulting in good sharpness overall. On the other hand, the Nikon lens is slightly sharper, heavier, and bulkier, making it less convenient for hand-held use over extended periods.
The Tamron lens also has a slight advantage in terms of portability and weight, which is essential when travelling and carrying gear around. In contrast, the Nikon lens is slightly bulkier and, therefore, more difficult to transport. Overall, both the Tamron 150 600 G2 and Nikon 200 500 perform well in terms of handling and durability, but the Tamron’s portability and weight make it an excellent option for those who want a versatile lens.
Frequently Asked Questions Of Tamron 150 600 G2 Vs Nikon 200 500
What Is The Difference Between Nikon 200 500 And Tamron 150 600?
The main difference between Nikon 200-500 and Tamron 150-600 is that Nikon is sharper and has snappier focus, while Tamron is slightly sharper, heavier, and bulkier. However, Tamron is better in weight and handling and it is compatible with Nikon cameras.
Both lenses have their benefits depending on individual preferences.
Is The Tamron 150 To 600 Sharp?
Yes, the Tamron 150 to 600 lens is sharp throughout its range when stopped down, has image stabilization, quick autofocus, and is relatively light and handholdable for a lens of its focal length. It provides good sharpness overall and best of bunch corner to corner at longer distances, has fast, accurate autofocus, decent tracking for birds, and better handling due to its weight difference compared to Nikon.
Is Tamron Lens Good For Nikon?
Yes, Tamron lenses are good for Nikon cameras. Tamron lenses designated with Di and Di II (with a Nikon mount) are compatible with Nikon DSLR and mirrorless cameras with a compatible Nikon FTZ adapter. Tamron lenses offer effective image stabilization, quick autofocus, good sharpness, and relatively lightweight for a lens of its focal length.
However, some Nikon lenses are slightly sharper with better focus, but Tamron lenses have an advantage in weight difference and better handling.
Is Tamron 150 600 G2 Weather Sealed?
Yes, Tamron 150 600 G2 is weather sealed.
Conclusion
To summarize, both the Tamron 150 600 G2 and Nikon 200 500 have their unique strengths in terms of sharpness, autofocus, weight, and handling. While the Nikon excels in overall sharpness and snappier focus, the Tamron offers the advantage of being lightweight and more manageable.
Ultimately, the choice between these two lenses will depend on the user’s specific needs and preferences. Regardless of which lens you choose, both offer excellent options for wildlife and sports photography.
