Fujifilm Gfx 100S Vs Sony A7Rv: Which Suits You Most?

As a seasoned photographer, I’ve had the chance to use both the Fujifilm GFX 100S and Sony A7R V extensively. These cameras are exceptional, but they serve different purposes based on your photography style. Here’s my take on how they stack up, shared as if we’re chatting over coffee.

Fujifilm Gfx 100S Vs Sony A7Rv Comparison

Key Points

• Image Quality: The GFX 100S likely offers superior detail due to its 102MP medium format sensor, while the A7R V’s 61MP full-frame sensor excels in versatility and low-light conditions.
• Autofocus: Sony’s hybrid autofocus seems faster and better for dynamic subjects, whereas Fujifilm’s system is precise for static shots.
• Video: The A7R V appears to have an edge with 8K capabilities, compared to the GFX 100S’s 4K maximum.
• Versatility: Sony’s extensive lens selection and lighter build make it more adaptable, while Fujifilm shines for deliberate, high-resolution work.
• Decision Factors: Your choice depends on whether you prioritize image detail (GFX 100S) or all-around performance (A7R V).

Practical Considerations

Sony’s lighter build and longer battery life make it travel-friendly. The GFX 100S’s dual SD slots are reliable, but Sony’s CFexpress option is faster. Lens availability favors Sony, though Fujifilm’s optics are top-notch.

Who Should Choose What?

Landscape photographers may prefer the GFX 100S for its resolution. For versatility, including wildlife or video, the A7R V is likely better. Try both if you can to feel the difference.

My In-Depth Comparison of Fujifilm GFX 100S vs Sony A7R VHey there, fellow photographers! Today, I’m excited to share my experiences with two incredible cameras: the Fujifilm GFX 100S and the Sony A7R V. Both are powerhouse tools, but they cater to different needs. Whether you’re capturing sweeping landscapes or fast-moving wildlife, I’ll break down their strengths to help you choose. Let’s dive in!

Sensor and Image Quality

The heart of any camera is its sensor. The GFX 100S boasts a 102MP medium format sensor, delivering jaw-dropping detail and dynamic range. It’s perfect for landscapes or studio work where every pixel counts. Images feel rich, with smooth tonal gradations that shine in large prints.

The Sony A7R V, with its 61MP full-frame sensor, isn’t far behind. It produces sharp, vibrant images with excellent low-light performance. While it has fewer megapixels, it’s versatile across various conditions. Sony’s color science is impressive, making post-processing a breeze.

Last summer, I took both to Yellowstone National Park. Using the GFX 100S with a GF 45mm f/2.8 lens, I captured the Grand Prismatic Spring. The 30×40-inch print revealed tiny mineral details, with vibrant colors and no loss in shadows or highlights. The Sony A7R V, paired with a 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II, produced a stunning image too, but side-by-side, the GFX 100S had a slight edge in fine detail. For waterfalls, though, Sony’s faster burst rate nailed the perfect splash moment.

Autofocus Performance

Autofocus can make or break a shot. The Sony A7R V’s hybrid system, blending phase- and contrast-detection, is lightning-fast. Its real-time eye AF tracks subjects like birds or people effortlessly. I’ve used it for wildlife, and it rarely misses focus, even in challenging light.

The GFX 100S relies on contrast-detection autofocus. It’s precise for static subjects like landscapes or portraits but slower for action. In studio settings, it nails focus consistently. For moving subjects, it feels a bit like older DSLR systems, which can be limiting.

I once shot a wedding with both cameras. The Sony A7R V was my go-to for candid moments, locking onto eyes during dances. The GFX 100S excelled for posed portraits, delivering tack-sharp results with deliberate framing.

Video Capabilities

Video is where the Sony A7R V pulls ahead. It shoots up to 8K at 25fps and 4K at 60fps, with S-Log3 and HLG for flexible grading. Its in-body stabilization is robust, making handheld shots smooth. This makes it a favorite for hybrid shooters.

The GFX 100S maxes out at 4K 30fps, with F-Log and HLG support. It’s capable for basic video needs but lacks the resolution and frame rate options of Sony. For photographers dabbling in video, it’s fine, but dedicated videographers will prefer Sony.

I shot a short travel vlog with both. The Sony A7R V’s 4K footage was crisp, with excellent dynamic range for sunset scenes. The GFX 100S produced beautiful 4K clips, but the lack of higher frame rates limited creative options like slow motion.

Battery Life

Battery life matters on long shoots. The Sony A7R V, with its NP-FZ100 battery, lasts around 670 shots per charge. I’ve gone entire days without swapping batteries, especially for casual shoots. It’s a reliable companion for travel.

The GFX 100S uses the NP-W235 battery, rated for about 460 shots. It’s decent but requires more frequent changes during intensive sessions. I always carry spares when using it for extended landscape trips.

Storage Options

Both cameras offer dual card slots for redundancy. The GFX 100S has two UHS-II SD slots, which are reliable and widely compatible. I’ve never had issues with write speeds, even for large 102MP files.

The Sony A7R V features one CFexpress Type A slot and one SD slot. The CFexpress slot is faster, ideal for 8K video or rapid bursts. SD slots are more budget-friendly, but CFexpress gives Sony an edge for high-performance needs.

Lens Mount and Selection

Lenses are critical to any system. The GFX 100S uses the GF mount, with Fujifilm’s high-quality medium format lenses. Options like the GF 32-64mm or 80mm f/1.7 are stellar but limited in range. There’s no equivalent to long telephotos like a 200-600mm.

Sony’s E-mount is a lens paradise. From Sony’s GM series to third-party options by Sigma and Tamron, you’ve got everything from ultra-wide to super-telephoto. For wildlife, I love the Sony 200-600mm; for landscapes, the 16-35mm GM II is a gem.

The Sony’s lens versatility makes it more adaptable. Fujifilm’s lenses, while fewer, are optically exceptional, pairing perfectly with the medium format sensor.

Comparison Table

Here’s a side-by-side look at the key features:

Aspect	Fujifilm GFX 100S	Sony A7R V
Sensor	102MP medium format	61MP full-frame
Image Quality	Superior detail, dynamic range	Excellent, strong low-light
Autofocus	Contrast-detection, great for static	Hybrid, fast, ideal for moving
Video	4K/30fps, F-Log, HLG	8K/25fps, 4K/60fps, S-Log3, HLG
Battery Life	~460 shots	~670 shots
Storage	Dual UHS-II SD	CFexpress Type A + SD
Lens Mount	GF, limited selection	E, extensive selection

Landscape Photography

For landscapes, the GFX 100S is a beast. Its 102MP sensor captures every blade of grass, and the dynamic range handles extreme lighting well. Paired with the GF 32-64mm, I’ve shot mountain vistas with stunning clarity.

The Sony A7R V is fantastic too, with its 61MP sensor and lenses like the 16-35mm GM II. It’s lighter, making it easier for long hikes. For A2 prints, though, the GFX 100S’s extra resolution shines.

Portrait Photography

Portraits are a strength for both. The GFX 100S’s medium format sensor renders skin tones beautifully, with a shallow depth of field for dreamy bokeh. The GF 80mm f/1.7 is a portrait masterpiece.

The Sony A7R V delivers vibrant portraits, and its eye AF ensures sharp focus on moving subjects. The 50mm f/1.2 GM is a favorite for its speed and clarity. Studio work favors Fujifilm; candid shots lean toward Sony.

Wildlife Photography

Wildlife is Sony’s domain. The A7R V’s fast autofocus and animal eye AF track birds in flight with ease. Lenses like the 200-600mm give reach that Fujifilm can’t match.

The GFX 100S can handle stationary wildlife, producing detailed images from hides. Its slower autofocus limits it for action. Sony is the clear winner here.

Build Quality and Handling

Both cameras are rugged, with weather-sealed magnesium alloy bodies. The GFX 100S feels substantial, with a deep grip that’s comfortable for long shoots. Its traditional dials are satisfying to use.

The Sony A7R V is compact and lighter, ideal for travel. Its modern interface, with customizable buttons, feels responsive. Sony’s menu system is more intuitive than Fujifilm’s.

Viewfinder Experience

The Sony A7R V’s 9.44 million dot EVF is bright and sharp, perfect for bright sunlight or fast panning. The GFX 100S’s 3.76 million dot EVF is clear but can dim outdoors. Sony’s viewfinder feels more advanced.

User Interface and Workflow

Sony’s interface is highly customizable, with function buttons for quick access. Its menus are logical, speeding up adjustments. File sizes from the 61MP sensor are large but manageable.

The GFX 100S has a simpler interface, which some prefer for its clarity. Its 102MP files demand more storage and processing power. Fujifilm’s menus are functional but less streamlined.

Accessories and Ecosystem

Fujifilm offers specialized GF lenses, like tilt-shift options for architecture. Sony’s broader ecosystem includes grips, flashes, and third-party lenses. Both support raw processing software, but I prefer Fujifilm’s X Raw Studio for its film simulations.

Decision-Making: Which One to Choose?

In the Fujifilm GFX 100S vs Sony A7R V debate, your choice hinges on your priorities. If you’re a landscape or studio photographer chasing ultimate image quality, the GFX 100S is unmatched. Its medium format sensor delivers prints that stun at any size.

For versatility—wildlife, action, or video—the Sony A7R V is superior. Its autofocus, lens options, and 8K video make it a hybrid powerhouse. It’s also lighter, ideal for travel or dynamic shoots.

Consider your workflow. The GFX 100S suits slow, deliberate photography; Sony excels in fast-paced scenarios. Lens availability is a factor—Sony’s E-mount offers more flexibility. Video shooters should lean toward Sony.

I recommend trying both, perhaps by renting or visiting a store. Feel their weight, test the controls, and view sample images. I own both, using the GFX 100S for landscapes and studio work, and the Sony A7R V for travel and action. Both are phenomenal, so align your choice with your needs.

Conclusion

The Fujifilm GFX 100S and Sony A7R V are exceptional cameras, each excelling in its niche. The GFX 100S is a medium format marvel for stills, perfect for landscapes and portraits. The Sony A7R V is a versatile all-rounder, ideal for action, wildlife, and video.

Think about your primary subjects and long-term goals. Whichever you pick, you’re getting a tool that will elevate your craft for years. Happy shooting!

FAQ: Common Questions About Fujifilm GFX 100S vs Sony A7R V

As a seasoned photographer, I often get questions about these two cameras. Here are answers to the most common ones, based on my experience and discussions with other photographers, to help you decide.

Which camera is more expensive and heavier?

The Fujifilm GFX 100S is generally more expensive due to its medium format sensor and specialized design. It’s also heavier, which can be a factor if you’re hiking or traveling. The Sony A7R V is lighter and more portable, ideal for on-the-go shooting.

Which system has a better lens selection?

Sony’s E-mount system offers a vast array of lenses, including Sony’s GM series and third-party options from Tamron and Sigma. This is great for landscapes, wildlife, or niche genres. Fujifilm’s GF mount has high-quality lenses, but the selection is smaller, which may limit versatility.

How do the resolutions compare, and is the difference noticeable?

The GFX 100S’s 102MP sensor outresolves the Sony A7R V’s 61MP sensor. The difference is noticeable in large prints or when cropping, where Fujifilm captures finer details. For web use or smaller prints, Sony’s resolution is often sufficient.

Which camera has better autofocus?

The Sony A7R V’s hybrid autofocus is faster and more reliable, especially for tracking moving subjects like wildlife or people. The GFX 100S’s contrast-detection autofocus is precise for static scenes but slower for action. Sony wins for dynamic photography.

Which camera performs better in low light?

The GFX 100S can edge out in low light due to its larger sensor, which gathers more light. However, the Sony A7R V’s low-light performance is also excellent, and the difference may be minimal in most scenarios. Fujifilm has a slight advantage for extreme conditions.

How do they compare in terms of depth of field control?

The Sony A7R V’s full-frame sensor allows for a shallower depth of field at equivalent apertures, creating more background blur for portraits. The GFX 100S needs wider apertures for similar effects due to its larger sensor. Sony is better for isolating subjects.

Which camera has a better viewfinder?

The Sony A7R V’s 9.44 million dot EVF is sharper and brighter than the GFX 100S’s 3.76 million dot EVF. This makes Sony’s viewfinder better for critical focusing, especially in bright sunlight. Fujifilm’s EVF is still good but less advanced.

Is one better for landscape photography?

The GFX 100S excels for landscapes due to its 102MP sensor, capturing intricate details for large prints. The Sony A7R V is also capable but may need more post-processing to match Fujifilm’s detail. Sony’s lighter weight suits long hikes.

Are there differences in handheld vs. tripod use?

The GFX 100S benefits from a tripod to maximize its high resolution, as handholding can introduce shake. The Sony A7R V’s in-body stabilization makes it more forgiving for handheld shooting. Sony is better for spontaneous shots.

Which is more versatile?

The Sony A7R V is more versatile, thanks to its fast autofocus, extensive lens options, and lighter build. It handles action, wildlife, video, and more. The GFX 100S is specialized for high-resolution stills in controlled settings like studios or landscapes.

Are there any considerations regarding the aspect ratio?

The GFX 100S’s 4:3 aspect ratio suits portraits but may feel less ideal for landscapes, where some pixels aren’t fully utilized. The Sony A7R V’s 3:2 ratio is more traditional for 35mm photography, aligning with common print sizes.

If considering both, in what order should one upgrade?

Start with the Sony A7R V if you’re upgrading from a full-frame camera, as it offers significant improvements. Later, if you need medium format resolution, consider the GFX 100S. This lets you evaluate needs without jumping to the pricier system.

Are there specific lenses available for one system that aren’t for the other?

Sony’s E-mount includes specialty lenses like Sigma’s 14mm f/1.4 for astrophotography, which Fujifilm’s GF system lacks. Fujifilm’s lenses are excellent but fewer, limiting options for niche genres. Sony offers more flexibility.

Can I use my existing Sony E-mount lenses on the GFX 100S?

No, the GFX 100S uses Fujifilm’s G Mount, incompatible with Sony’s E-mount. Adapters exist, but they may compromise autofocus and stabilization. For best results, use native GF lenses with the GFX 100S.