Canon 10-18 Vs 16-35: Which Is The Best Lens?

Canon 10-18 and 16-35 offer different focal lengths for different purposes. The 10-18 is perfect for wide-angle shots while the 16-35 is better suited for landscape and architectural photography.

The Canon 10-18mm and the 16-35mm are two of Canon’s best ultra-wide-angle lens offerings that have generated buzz to photographers and videographers alike. Although both lenses offer exceptional optical quality and reliable build, their focal lengths are what set them apart from each other.

The 10-18mm lens is a budget-friendly ultra-wide-angle zoom lens that provides a focal length for significantly wide-angle shots. It’s mainly used for shooting architecture, landscapes, and tight interiors, and it has a stepping motor for faster and quieter autofocus. Meanwhile, the 16-35mm is more suited for scenic landscape and architecture photography, thanks to its full-frame sensor compatibility. With its constant f/4 maximum aperture, the lens offers a consistent brightness across the zoom range, and it delivers superior quality photos as well.

Canon 10-18 Vs 16-35: Which Is The Best Lens?

Credit: tuxoche.com

Size Comparison

The Canon 10-18 and 16-35 are lenses with different focal lengths that offer distinct features. The 10-18 is a compact lens that is perfect for wide-angle photography, while the 16-35 is a professional-grade lens that has a wider focal length range.

Which one you choose will depend on your specific needs and budget.

Canon 10-18 Canon 16-35
Size: 74.6mm x 72mm Size: 82.6mm x 112mm
Weight: 240g Weight: 635g
Zoom: 10-18mm Zoom: 16-35mm

The Canon 10-18 and 16-35 lenses have noticeable differences in their size and weight. The 10-18mm lens is much lighter and more compact, making it a great choice for photographers who are always on-the-go. On the other hand, the 16-35mm lens is much larger and heavier, making it more robust and durable.

Digging a bit deeper, the 10-18mm lens has a wider zoom range at 10-18mm, whereas the 16-35mm has a longer zoom range at 16-35mm. Both lenses also have noticeable differences in terms of their autofocus, with the 10-18mm having an STM motor and the 16-35mm having an ultrasonic motor. In terms of image quality, both lenses produce sharp and vibrant images, and both lenses have great autofocus. Ultimately, the decision between these two lenses depends on the photographer’s individual needs and shooting preferences.

Canon 10-18 Vs 16-35: Which Is The Best Lens?

Credit: www.youtube.com

Autofocus And Image Quality

The Canon 10-18 and 16-35 lenses differ in terms of autofocus and image quality. The 10-18 has a smoother and quieter autofocus, while the 16-35 has a more sophisticated autofocus system. The image quality of the 16-35 is superb, with great sharpness and clarity, but the 10-18 is a more affordable option and still produces good results.

STM Motor
The Canon 10-18mm lens has an STM (stepping motor) motor which allows for smooth and quiet autofocus. This is great for videographers who need to capture audio while filming. The Canon 16-35mm lens, on the other hand, utilizes an ultrasonic motor which while fast, can be quite noisy during autofocus.
Autofocus Noise
In terms of autofocus noise, there is a significant difference between the two lenses. The Canon 10-18mm lens with its STM motor is virtually noiseless, while the 16-35mm lens with its ultrasonic motor can be quite loud. This is something to consider if you plan on doing a lot of video work with audio.
Image Quality
When it comes to image quality, both lenses produce stunning images with sharp detail and vibrant colors. However, the Canon 16-35mm lens is a professional L-series lens, and as such, it has some additional features that make it a better choice for professionals. These include weather sealing and a better build quality, making it more durable and reliable in a range of shooting conditions.

Distortion And Flare

When comparing Canon’s 10-18 and 16-35 lenses for distortion and flare, it’s important to consider lens profile corrections. Both lenses have noticeable barrel distortion, but the 16-35 has much less distortion when profile corrections are applied. In terms of flare, the 10-18 is more susceptible due to its wider field of view, but can be easily corrected in post-processing with a lens profile or hood. The 16-35 has better resistance to flare overall. It’s important to note that the 10-18 is a more affordable option for crop sensor cameras, while the 16-35 is a higher end, full-frame lens. Each lens has its pros and cons, and choosing the right one ultimately depends on the photographer’s needs and budget.

Ken Rockwell And Other Reviews

Photography enthusiasts looking to compare the Canon 10-18 vs 16-35 lens have a wide range of review resources available, including Ken Rockwell’s expert analysis, DxOMark, Photography Bay, and YouTube reviews from Fya Vlogs and Darren Miles. The 10-18 is a more affordable ultrawide option, while the 16-35 offers better low light/high ISO performance with thinner depth of field.

Ken Rockwell and Other Reviews
Full-frame cameras offer a thinner depth of field and better low light performance. Less noise at high ISO is also an advantage. Third-party lenses like the Sigma 10-20mm and the Tokina 11-16mm are good options for ultra-wide photography.

Canon 10-18 vs 16-35
Comparisons between Canon’s budget-friendly 10-18mm and Canon’s professional 16-35mm lens can be found on multiple platforms. Fya Vlogs and Frank Penalver made YouTube videos comparing the lenses. Darren Miles also has a comprehensive review on his channel. Idalia Photography wrote an informative blog post on what’s in their camera bag. They use both lenses when shooting weddings. DxOMark, Digital Photography Review, and Lens Rentals also have useful content.

Canon 10-18 Vs 16-35: Which Is The Best Lens?

Credit: m.youtube.com

Frequently Asked Questions On Canon 10-18 Vs 16-35

What Is The Canon 10-18mm Lens Good For?

The Canon 10-18mm lens is made for wide-angle shots and is suitable for landscape, architecture, and real estate photography. The lens provides a great focal length range, allowing users to capture a wider field of view. With its excellent image quality and sharpness, it is perfect for photographers who want to capture high-quality images.

What Is A 16 35 Lens Used For?

A 16-35mm lens is a wide-angle lens. It is used for landscape photography, interior, and architectural shots. It is also useful for capturing a wider perspective of events, such as sports games or concerts.

What Is The Alternative To Canon Ef 16-35mm?

A third party ultra-wide lens can be an alternative to Canon EF 16-35mm.

What Is The Sharpest Aperture For Canon 16 35?

The sharpest aperture for Canon 16-35 is f/8.

Conclusion

To sum up, both Canon 10-18 and 16-35 lenses have their pros and cons. The 10-18mm lens is an affordable option with impressive image quality and sharpness, especially at the wider end. On the other hand, the 16-35mm lens provides more versatility, better build quality, and a wider aperture for low light situations.

Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on your specific needs and shooting style. Nevertheless, both lenses are excellent options for those looking to capture stunning wide-angle landscapes and architecture.

Website | + posts

I am a photography enthusiast turned blogger, sharing my passion and expertise on her blog, "CallofPhotography." Growing up surrounded by nature, I developed a love for capturing moments through my lens. After studying Fine Arts with a focus on photography, I launched my blog to share tutorials, gear reviews, and my own photographic work. Through engaging storytelling, I invites readers to join her visual journey, inspiring and empowering photographers of all levels worldwide.

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 0 comments