0

Canon 17-35 2.8 Vs 17-40 F4: Which Lens Dominates?

The Canon 17-35 2.8 and 17-40 F4 are both versatile wide-angle lenses, with the 2.8 offering a wider aperture but the F4 being more affordable.

Introduction To Canon 17-35 2.8 And 17-40 F4 Lenses

In this blog post, we will compare the Canon 17-35 2.8 lens and the Canon 17-40 F4 lens. Both lenses are popular choices for photographers looking for wide-angle options. Let’s start with an overview of the Canon 17-35 2.8 lens. This lens offers a constant aperture of 2.8 throughout its zoom range, providing excellent low-light performance. It has great build quality and is compatible with filters, making it a versatile option for landscape and architectural photography.

Now let’s discuss the Canon 17-40 F4 lens. This lens also offers a wide-angle range and has a slightly smaller aperture of F4. Although not as fast as the 17-35 2.8 lens, it still performs well in various lighting conditions. The 17-40 F4 lens is known for its sharpness and minimal distortion, making it a reliable choice for landscape and travel photography.

In conclusion, both the Canon 17-35 2.8 lens and the Canon 17-40 F4 lens have their own strengths and are suitable for different types of photography. It ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. We hope this overview helps you in making an informed decision.

Credit: fstoppers.com

Build Quality And Design

The build quality and design are important factors to consider when comparing the Canon 17-35 2.8 and the Canon 17-40 F4 lenses.

Starting with the construction of the Canon 17-35 2.8 lens, it is well-built and sturdy. The lens barrel is made of high-quality materials that provide durability and resistance to wear and tear. The lens also features weather-sealing, making it suitable for shooting in various environmental conditions. Additionally, the lens has a smooth and precise zoom ring, allowing for easy and precise focal length adjustments.

On the other hand, the Canon 17-40 F4 lens also boasts a solid build quality. It is made of high-grade materials, ensuring longevity and reliability. The lens is lightweight, which makes it suitable for travel and handheld shooting. The zoom and focus rings are smooth and responsive, making it comfortable to use.

Image Quality And Performance

When comparing the Canon 17-35 2.8 and the Canon 17-40 F4, the image quality and performance of both lenses are key factors to consider.

In terms of sharpness and resolution, the Canon 17-35 2.8 tends to perform slightly better than the 17-40 F4. The 2.8 aperture allows for better low-light performance and a shallow depth of field.

Both lenses produce excellent results in color and contrast. The colors are vibrant, and the contrast is well-balanced, providing pleasing and accurate images.

The Canon 17-35 2.8 performs slightly better in terms of distortion and vignetting. It has minimal distortion and vignetting, even at the widest focal length.

Auto focus speed and accuracy is another important aspect, and both lenses perform well. The Canon 17-35 2.8 has a slightly faster and more accurate focus, which can be beneficial in fast-paced shooting situations.

Overall, both lenses offer high-quality image performance, but the Canon 17-35 2.8 has a slight edge in terms of sharpness, distortion, and autofocus speed.

Focusing And Minimum Focus Distance

When it comes to focusing performance, both the Canon 17-35 2.8 and 17-40 F4 lenses provide excellent results. The Canon 17-35 2.8 lens offers fast and accurate autofocus, making it ideal for capturing subjects in motion. It also has a minimum focus distance of 0.28m, allowing you to get close to your subject and create unique perspectives. On the other hand, the Canon 17-40 F4 lens also delivers reliable autofocus performance and has a minimum focus distance of 0.28m, enabling you to capture close-up details with ease.

Both lenses exhibit sharpness throughout their focal range, ensuring clear and detailed images. Furthermore, their focus shift is minimal, guaranteeing consistent focus accuracy. When it comes to handling longitudinal aberrations and flare resistance, both lenses perform admirably, providing high-quality images with minimal aberrations and flare. Overall, both the Canon 17-35 2.8 and 17-40 F4 lenses offer impressive focusing performance and a minimum focus distance that allows for creative and detailed shots.

Filter Compatibility

The filter compatibility of the Canon 17-35 2. 8 and the 17-40 F4 lenses is an important consideration when choosing between the two. These lenses have different filter sizes, with the 17-35 2. 8 requiring a larger filter size compared to the 17-40 F4.

Flare Resistance And Lens Coating

The Flare Resistance and Lens Coating of the Canon 17-35 2. 8 and the Canon 17-40 F4 are important factors to consider when comparing the two lenses. The lens coatings on both models help to reduce flare and enhance image quality, ensuring crisp and clear photographs in various lighting conditions.

Flare Resistance and Lens Coating

Flare Resistance of Canon 17-35 2.8 Lens

The Canon 17-35 2.8 lens showcases impressive flare resistance, thanks to its advanced lens coating. The lens coating effectively reduces ghosting and flaring, resulting in images with improved contrast and clarity. Even in challenging lighting conditions, this lens minimizes the impact of unwanted light and maintains the integrity of the image. Photographers who frequently shoot outdoors or in strong light sources will appreciate the flare resistance of this lens, as it allows them to capture vivid and detailed shots without worrying about unwanted artifacts.

Flare Resistance of Canon 17-40 F4 Lens

The Canon 17-40 F4 lens also offers great flare resistance due to its lens coating. Similar to the Canon 17-35 2.8 lens, the lens coating on the 17-40 F4 minimizes ghosting and flaring, ensuring clear and high-contrast images. With this lens, photographers can confidently shoot in challenging lighting conditions, knowing that they can maintain the desired levels of contrast and detail without being hindered by unwanted reflections or artifacts. Whether capturing landscapes or indoor scenes with strong light sources, the Canon 17-40 F4 lens delivers impressive flare resistance, making it a reliable choice for photographers looking for consistent image quality.

Lens Coating and Ghosting/Flaring

The lens coating on both the Canon 17-35 2.8 and 17-40 F4 lenses plays a crucial role in reducing ghosting and flaring. Ghosting occurs when unwanted reflections appear in the image, while flaring refers to the loss of contrast and detail caused by scattered light. The advanced lens coating on these lenses effectively minimizes these unwanted optical phenomena, resulting in images with improved clarity and contrast. By reducing the impact of stray light, the lens coating enhances the overall image quality, allowing photographers to capture stunning shots with minimal interference from ghosting or flaring.

Price And Value For Money

The Canon 17-35 2. 8 and 17-40 F4 lenses offer different price points and value for money. While the 2. 8 lens may be more expensive, it provides a wider aperture for better low light performance, while the F4 lens offers a more budget-friendly option without compromising on image quality.

Canon 17-35mm f/2.8 Lens	Canon 17-40mm f/4 Lens
The Canon 17-35mm f/2.8 lens is known for its excellent build quality and wide aperture. It offers a wider maximum aperture of f/2.8, allowing for better low-light performance and shallow depth of field. The lens has good sharpness throughout the zoom range and is a great choice for landscape and architectural photography.	The Canon 17-40mm f/4 lens is also well-built and offers a versatile focal length range. While it has a narrower maximum aperture of f/4, it still delivers great image quality. This lens is more budget-friendly compared to the 17-35mm f/2.8 and is a popular choice for photographers looking for a wide-angle lens.
When it comes to price, the Canon 17-35mm f/2.8 lens is generally more expensive than the 17-40mm f/4 lens. However, it is important to consider the value for money and long-term investment. The 17-35mm f/2.8 lens offers a wider aperture and better low-light performance, which can be beneficial in certain shooting situations.	The Canon 17-40mm f/4 lens may be a more affordable option for photographers on a budget, but it still delivers good image quality and is a reliable lens for various types of photography. It offers a great balance between price and performance.

Please note that the information provided is based on general reviews and comparisons. It is recommended to do further research and consider your specific needs and shooting style before making a purchase decision.

Credit: www.quora.com

Conclusion And Recommendation

The Canon 17-35 2. 8 and 17-40 F4 lenses are both excellent options for wide angle photography. Their image quality, build, and features contribute to their popularity among photographers. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on individual preferences and specific shooting needs.

Comparative Analysis Of Canon 17-35 2.8 And 17-40 F4 Lenses

After thoroughly comparing the Canon 17-35 2.8 and 17-40 F4 lenses, here are my recommendations for different use cases:

Lens	Use Case	Recommendation
Canon 17-35 2.8	Professional photography, especially in low-light conditions	This lens offers a wider aperture of f/2.8, allowing for better performance in low-light situations. It is ideal for capturing sharp and detailed images in challenging lighting conditions. The build quality is top-notch, ensuring durability and reliability.
Canon 17-40 F4	General-purpose photography, landscape photography	This lens is a great option for general-purpose photography and landscape photography. While it has a narrower aperture of f/4, it still delivers excellent image quality. It is lightweight and compact, making it convenient for travel and outdoor shoots.

In conclusion, both lenses have their strengths and weaknesses, so it is important to consider your specific needs and shooting conditions. Whether you prioritize a wider aperture or portability, Canon has options to suit different preferences.

Credit: www.kenrockwell.com

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is A Canon 17-40mm Lens Used For?

The Canon 17-40mm lens is used for wide-angle photography. It is ideal for capturing landscapes, architecture, and group shots with its versatile focal length range. The lens delivers sharp images and has good flare resistance. It is a popular choice among photographers for its build quality and compatibility with Canon DSLR cameras.

Is Canon 17 40 Good For Portraits?

The Canon 17-40 lens is not specifically designed for portraits, but it can still produce good results. Its wide-angle focal length may not be ideal for close-up portraits, but it can capture environmental portraits with a unique perspective.

Is The Canon 17 40 Sharp?

The Canon 17-40 lens is considered sharp, but it may be a bit soft at the longer end. The lens performs well in terms of build quality, focusing, and flare resistance. It has a minimum focus distance and is compatible with filters.

Overall, it is a good option for wide-angle photography.

What Is A 17 35mm Lens Used For?

A 17-35mm lens is used for wide-angle photography, allowing you to capture a larger field of view. It is commonly used for landscape, architectural, and interior photography. Its versatile focal length range makes it suitable for capturing expansive scenes while still maintaining sharpness and detail.

Conclusion

To summarize, the Canon 17-35 2. 8 and 17-40 F4 are both great lens options for photographers looking to capture wide-angle shots. The 17-35 2. 8 offers a wider aperture, allowing for better low-light performance, while the 17-40 F4 is more budget-friendly.

Factors such as build quality, focusing ability, sharpness, and flare resistance should also be considered when making a decision. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and specific shooting needs. So, take your time to research and make an informed decision based on your requirements.

Happy shooting!