0

Nikon 24-120 vs Sigma 24-105: The Ultimate Lens Showdown

The Sigma 24-105 is generally considered to be sharper compared to the Nikon 24-120. However, it lacks weather and dust seals and its version of vibration reduction (VR) is not the same.

The focus ring on the Sigma is flimsy, making manual focus difficult. Despite these drawbacks, the Sigma lens is likely better built and offers sharpness throughout its aperture and focal range. Although bulkier and heavier than the Nikon lens, this may not be a personal concern for many.

Overall, the Sigma 24-105 comes with some trade-offs but delivers excellent image quality.

Key Specifications Compared

The Sigma 24-105 lens is often regarded as sharper, but it lacks weather and dust seals. Its VR function differs from the Nikon lens. The Sigma is likely better constructed and offers consistent sharpness. It may be bulkier and heavier than the Nikon, but this may not be a concern for some.

Nikon 24-120	Sigma 24-105
Focal Length	Focal Length
24-120mm	24-105mm
Aperture Range	Aperture Range
f/4-4.8	f/4-5.6
Filter Size	Filter Size
77mm	82mm
Compatibility	Compatibility
Compatible with most Nikon camera bodies	Compatible with most Canon camera bodies
Weight	Weight
710 grams	885 grams
Dimensions	Dimensions
Approx. 84 x 103.5mm	Approx. 88.6 x 109.4mm

Sharpness Across The Range

The Nikon 24-120 and Sigma 24-105 lenses both have their strengths and weaknesses. While the Sigma is often praised for its sharpness, it lacks weather and dust seals and its VR is different from the Nikon. On the other hand, the Nikon is lighter and more compact.

Sharpness Across the Range

Center sharpness comparison at various apertures:

The Sigma lens is typically assessed as being sharper compared to the Nikon lens. It is tack sharp throughout its aperture and focal range, providing excellent image quality. On the other hand, the Nikon lens may not be as sharp in the center at certain apertures. It’s worth considering this difference if center sharpness is a priority for your photography needs.

Corner sharpness evaluation for both lenses:

Regarding corner sharpness, both lenses perform well but may have slight variations. The Sigma lens is known for maintaining good sharpness across the frame, including the corners. The Nikon lens also delivers acceptable corner sharpness, but it may not be as consistently sharp as the Sigma in this regard.

Distortion and aberration handling in Nikon and Sigma:

Both Nikon and Sigma lenses have advanced distortion and aberration correction capabilities. They are designed to minimize distortions and aberrations, resulting in clean and accurate images. However, it’s important to note that the specific handling of distortions and aberrations may vary slightly between the two lenses. It is recommended to thoroughly research and evaluate the particular characteristics and capabilities of each lens before making a final decision.

Low Light Capabilities

When comparing the low light capabilities of the Nikon 24-120 and the Sigma 24-105, the effectiveness of vibration reduction (VR) plays a crucial role. While the Nikon 24-120 features VR technology, the Sigma 24-105 lens lacks this feature.

Image stabilization is important when shooting in low light conditions, as it helps to minimize camera shake and capture sharp images. The Nikon 24-120’s VR system provides excellent stabilization, allowing for handheld shooting even in challenging lighting situations.

On the other hand, the Sigma 24-105 lens does not include image stabilization, which can limit its performance in low light. Without VR, photographers may need to use higher ISO settings or a tripod to compensate for camera shake, potentially resulting in compromised image quality.

Another important factor to consider in low light is the aperture performance and bokeh quality. Both lenses have a maximum aperture of f/4, but it’s worth noting that the Nikon 24-120 has a slightly wider aperture range, allowing for more light to enter the lens. This can result in better bokeh and improved low light performance.

Overall, while the Sigma 24-105 lens is often praised for its sharpness, its lack of VR and slightly narrower aperture range may make it less suitable for low light photography compared to the Nikon 24-120.

Autofocus And Handling

Autofocus and Handling

Nikon’s autofocus speed against Sigma’s accuracy When comparing the autofocus speed of the Nikon 24-120 and the Sigma 24-105, it is important to note the trade-offs between speed and accuracy. The Nikon lens is known for its quick autofocus performance, allowing photographers to capture fast-moving subjects with ease. It accurately locks focus in various lighting conditions, ensuring sharp images. On the other hand, the Sigma lens emphasizes accuracy over speed. While it may not focus as quickly as the Nikon, it excels at precisely acquiring focus, particularly in challenging situations or on subjects with fine details.

Manual focus experience with both lenses When it comes to manual focus, the Nikon 24-120 has a notable advantage. Its focus ring is solid and provides a smooth and precise manual focus experience. This is particularly useful for photographers who prefer manual focus or need to fine-tune their focus. On the other hand, the Sigma 24-105 falls short in terms of manual focus usability. Its focus ring is described as flimsy, making it challenging to achieve accurate manual focus.

Weather sealing and build quality comparison When it comes to weather sealing and build quality, the Nikon 24-120 has an advantage over the Sigma 24-105. The Nikon lens is weather-sealed, protecting it from dust and moisture, which makes it suitable for outdoor and challenging shooting conditions. On the other hand, the Sigma lens lacks weather and dust seals, making it more vulnerable to environmental factors. However, it is important to note that the Sigma lens is generally considered to be better built, with a sturdy construction that withstands regular use.

Ergonomics And Build

Ergonomics and Build

Handling comfort: weight and size considerations

The Nikon 24-120 lens offers a comfortable handling experience with its optimal weight and size. It strikes a good balance, providing a solid build without being overly bulky or heavy. On the other hand, the Sigma 24-105 lens is known for its sharpness but lacks weather and dust sealing. Additionally, some users have reported that the focus ring of the Sigma lens is flimsy, making manual focus difficult. However, the Sigma lens compensates for these drawbacks by being better built and tack sharp throughout its aperture and focal range, even though it is slightly bulkier and heavier than the Nikon lens. Overall, personal preferences and priorities will play a role in deciding which lens is the better fit for each photographer’s needs.

Credit: m.youtube.com

Real-world Applications

When comparing the Nikon 24-120 lens to the Sigma 24-105 lens, real-world applications play a crucial role in determining their versatility for different photography styles.

In travel, portrait, and landscape photography, lens performance is essential in capturing stunning images. Both lenses offer sharpness, but the Sigma is often considered sharper. However, it lacks weather and dust seals compared to the Nikon and its version of VR is different.

The focus ring on the Sigma lens is flimsy, making manual focus difficult. On the other hand, the Nikon lens is well-built and offers tack sharpness throughout its aperture and focal range. While the Sigma lens may be bulkier and heavier, this may not be a concern for every photographer.

Whether you are a professional or a hobbyist, these lenses have their own advantages and disadvantages. Consider your specific needs and preferences before making a decision.

Extras Offered By Each Brand

The Sigma 24-105 is generally considered sharper than the Nikon 24-120. However, the Sigma lacks weather and dust seals and its VR technology is not the same. The Sigma is also better built and tack sharp throughout its aperture and focal range, although it is bulkier and heavier than the Nikon.

Extras Offered by Each Brand
Compatibility with teleconverters and other accessories	When it comes to compatibility with teleconverters and other accessories, the Nikon 24-120mm lens has an advantage. It is designed to work seamlessly with Nikon teleconverters, providing the ability to extend the focal length of the lens. On the other hand, the Sigma 24-105mm lens may not have the same level of compatibility with teleconverters and other accessories.
Lens hood design and effectiveness	In terms of lens hood design and effectiveness, the Nikon 24-120mm lens offers a well-designed and effective lens hood. It helps to reduce lens flare and protects the lens from accidental bumps and scratches. The Sigma 24-105mm lens also comes with a lens hood, but its design and effectiveness may not be as good as the Nikon lens.
Warranty and customer support differences	When it comes to warranty and customer support, Nikon is known for its reliable customer service and offers a standard warranty for its lenses. On the other hand, Sigma’s customer support and warranty terms may vary. It is important to check the warranty and customer support details provided by each brand before making a purchase decision.

Value And Investment

The Sigma 24-105 lens is often considered to be sharper than the Nikon 24-120 lens. However, the Sigma lacks weather and dust seals and has a flimsy focus ring. Despite its bulk and weight, the Sigma still delivers excellent sharpness.

Value and Investment
Pricing comparison and long-term value	When comparing the Nikon 24-120 and the Sigma 24-105 lenses, one crucial aspect to consider is the pricing and long-term value. The Sigma lens is often regarded as being sharper, which can be advantageous for photographers seeking optimal image quality. However, it is worth noting that the Sigma lens lacks certain features such as weather and dust seals, and its version of VR may not be as effective as the Nikon lens.
Resale value and market preference	Another factor to weigh in the value and investment of these lenses is the resale value and market preference. While the Nikon lens may have a higher resale value due to its reputation and popularity among photographers, the Sigma lens may be a preferred choice for those seeking a more affordable option without compromising too much on image quality.
Assessing the cost-benefit ratio for each lens	Ultimately, assessing the cost-benefit ratio for each lens is essential. The Sigma lens may be an attractive option for photographers on a budget, providing good image quality at a lower price point. On the other hand, the Nikon lens offers potential advantages such as weather and dust seals, potentially higher resale value, and the familiarity and trust associated with the Nikon brand.

Balance Of Quality And Convenience

When comparing the Nikon 24-120 lens to the Sigma 24-105 lens, there are some key factors to consider. In terms of image quality, the Sigma lens is often considered to be sharper. However, it is important to note that the Sigma lens lacks weather and dust seals, and its version of VR may not be as effective. In terms of build quality, the Sigma lens is generally regarded as being better built than the Nikon lens. It is tack sharp throughout its aperture and focal range, and although it is bulkier and heavier than the Nikon lens, this may not be a concern for some photographers. Ultimately, the decision between the Nikon 24-120 and the Sigma 24-105 will depend on your specific photography needs and preferences. Some photographers may prioritize image quality and sharpness, while others may prioritize convenience and build quality. Personal anecdotes can also play a role in the decision-making process. Hearing from photographers who have experience with both lenses can provide valuable insights and help inform your decision.

Comparing User Sentiments

When comparing the user sentiments for Nikon 24-120 vs Sigma 24-105, it is generally believed that the Sigma lens offers sharper image quality. However, the Sigma lens lacks weather and dust seals and its version of VR is not on par with Nikon’s.

Despite being bulkier and heavier, the Sigma lens is considered to be well-built and tack sharp throughout its aperture and focal range.

Overall Satisfaction from Existing User Reviews	Common Criticisms and Praises for Each Lens	Professional Photographer Endorsements and Preferences
The Sigma lens is often considered to be sharper compared to the Nikon lens.	The Sigma lens lacks weather and dust seals, and its version of VR is not as efficient. Some users also find the focus ring to be flimsy, making manual focus difficult.	Professional photographers tend to prefer the Nikon lens due to its image quality and performance in various shooting conditions.
The Sigma lens is known for its sharpness throughout the aperture and focal range. However, it is bulkier and heavier than the Nikon lens, which may not be a concern for some photographers.

Frequently Asked Questions For Nikon 24-120 Vs Sigma 24-105

What Is The Nikon 24 120 Lens Good For?

The Nikon 24-120 lens is good for a variety of photography needs. It is sharp and can be used for a wide range of focal lengths and apertures. It is slightly bulkier and heavier than other lenses, but this doesn’t affect its performance.

It is suitable for landscape, travel, and general-purpose photography.

Is The Sigma 24 105 Full Frame?

Yes, the Sigma 24-105 lens is designed for full frame cameras. It offers excellent sharpness and a wide range of focal lengths for versatile shooting. Its build quality is also impressive.

Is The Nikon 24 120 F4 Weather Sealed?

Yes, the Nikon 24-120 F4 is weather sealed, providing protection against dust and moisture.

How Much Does A Sigma 24 105 Art Nikon Weigh?

The Sigma 24-105mm Art lens for Nikon weighs about (weight in grams would be preferable).

Conclusion

While the Sigma 24-105 may be deemed sharper, it falls short in terms of weather and dust seals, as well as its VR capabilities. However, it offers a sturdier build and maintains excellent sharpness across its aperture and focal range.

Although bulkier and heavier than the Nikon, this may not be a concern for some. Ultimately, the decision between the two lenses will depend on individual preferences and priorities.