0

Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 vs Nikon 300mm F2.8: Powerhouse Comparison

The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 is heavier but cheaper compared to the Nikon 300mm F2.8 lens. The Sigma lens offers versatility and affordability without compromising on image quality.

In contrast, the Nikon lens is slightly lighter but larger in size.

Credit: mikescamera.blog

Weight And Size

The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 lens is heavier compared to the Nikon 300mm F2.8 lens. The Sigma lens weighs 6.4 lb (pounds), while the Nikon lens is a little lighter. However, the Sigma lens is also slightly larger in size. The weight and size of the lens play a significant role in its usability and portability.

Price

Comparing the Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 and the Nikon 300mm F2. 8, the Sigma lens offers similar quality at a lower price point. While the Nikon may be a bit lighter, the Sigma provides excellent value for photographers seeking versatility in their telephoto lens.

Comparison of prices

Factors contributing to price difference

The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 and the Nikon 300mm F2.8 lenses have a price difference. The factors contributing to this difference can be attributed to various aspects. Firstly, the brand reputation plays a role in determining the price. Nikon is a well-established and renowned brand, which may account for its higher price compared to Sigma. Another factor to consider is the build quality and materials used. Nikon lenses are known for their durability and high-quality construction, which can justify their higher cost. Differences in image quality and performance capabilities can also influence the price disparity. Additionally, the presence of image stabilization technology, autofocus capabilities, and additional features can contribute to the higher cost of the Nikon lens. It is important for photographers to evaluate their specific needs and budget constraints before making a decision on which lens to purchase.

Zoom Performance

The Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 and Nikon 300mm F2. 8 offer outstanding zoom performance. The Sigma lens is heavier but more affordable, while the Nikon lens is slightly lighter but larger in size, making them both great options for photographers.

Zoom Performance: The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 and the Nikon 300mm F2.8 are both powerful zoom lenses that offer exceptional performance in capturing distant subjects. The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 is a versatile lens that provides a wide zoom range, allowing you to capture a variety of subjects from close-ups to distant shots. On the other hand, the Nikon 300mm F2.8 offers a fixed focal length of 300mm, providing great magnification and a narrower field of view. In terms of zoom capabilities, both lenses deliver impressive results. However, it is important to note that the Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 has a slightly longer zoom range, giving you more flexibility in framing and composition.

Credit: mikescamera.blog

Sample Images

Comparing the Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 to the Nikon 300mm F2. 8, the Sigma is heavier but cheaper. Both lenses offer impressive zoom range and autofocus capabilities. Several YouTubers have provided sample photos and in-depth reviews for a comprehensive understanding.

Comparison Of Portrait Samples When comparing the portrait samples taken with the Sigma 120-300Mm F2 8 and the Nikon 300Mm F2 8, there are a few notable differences. The Sigma lens captured sharp and crisp images with excellent color reproduction. The subjects were well-defined, and the background had a pleasing bokeh effect. On the other hand, the Nikon lens produced slightly softer images with a more natural and neutral color palette. The bokeh was also pleasant, but not as smooth as the Sigma lens. Overall, both lenses are capable of delivering excellent portrait shots, but it ultimately comes down to personal preference and the specific look and style you are aiming for in your photographs.

Comparison Of Action Shots When it comes to action shots, both the Sigma 120-300Mm F2 8 and the Nikon 300Mm F2 8 excel in capturing fast-moving subjects. The Sigma lens proved to be incredibly versatile, allowing for quick and accurate autofocus, while also providing a useful zoom range. The Nikon lens, although slightly heavier and bigger in size, still offered excellent tracking capabilities and precise focus. While there is no clear winner in this category, it is important to consider factors such as personal shooting style, budget, and specific camera compatibility when making a decision between these two lenses.

Credit: www.naturalart.ca

Frequently Asked Questions On Sigma 120-300mm F2 8 Vs Nikon 300mm F2 8

How Much Does A Sigma 120 300mm F2 8 Sport Weight?

The Sigma 120-300mm f2. 8 sport lens weighs 6. 4 lbs.

How Much Does A Nikon 300mm F2 8 Lens Weigh?

The weight of a Nikon 300mm f2. 8 lens is approximately 6. 4 lb (pounds).

Is The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 Lens Heavier Than The Nikon 300mm F2.8 Lens?

Yes, the Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 lens is heavier compared to the Nikon 300mm F2. 8 lens.

Why Is The Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 Lens More Expensive?

The Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 lens is more expensive due to its superior build quality, advanced features, and exceptional optical performance.

Conclusion

Ultimately, choosing between the Sigma 120-300mm F2. 8 and the Nikon 300mm F2. 8 will depend on your specific needs and preferences. Both lenses offer exceptional image quality and performance, with the Sigma being slightly heavier but more affordable. The Nikon lens, on the other hand, is a little lighter and slightly larger.

Whether you prioritize weight, cost, or other factors, both lenses are excellent options for professional photographers and enthusiasts alike.